Sugar Loaf - 0.15 Terapix by The Rio de Janeiro - Hong Kong Connection

sraa elkhaleeg (January 04, 2016, 06:35PM )

Prime Questar has many focal lengths numbering almost 3540 m to that the ability to overcome the threshold .TeraPixel need to be connected to a powerful camera memory card and many of the search engines is where the best of them ishttp://alsabaak.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d8 %a7%d8%ab%d8%a7%d8%ab-%d9%85%d8%b3%d8%aa%d8%b9%d9% 85%d9%84-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b 6/ alsabaak.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8 %a9-%d8%aa%d8%ae%d8%b2%d9%8a%d9%86-%d8%a7%d8%ab%d8 %a7%d8%ab-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8% b6 / alsabaak.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8 %a9-%d9%86%d9%82%d9%84-%d8%a7%d8%ab%d8%a7%d8%ab-%d 8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b6 / alsabaak.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8 %a9-%d9%85%d9%83%d8%a7%d9%81%d8%ad%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9 %84%d9%86%d9%85%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a7%d8%a8%d9% 8a%d8%b6-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b 6 /

ahmed maher (November 24, 2015, 09:21AM )

[كشف تسربات المياة](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/05/01120 486780502332301.html ) [عزل اسطح](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/05/05325 82111.html ) [تخزين اثاث](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/09/05023 32301.html ) [ترميم منازل](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/05/01120 48678_15.html ) [مكافحه حشرات](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/05/05023 32301-0112048678.html ) [نظافه عامه بالرياض](alesleh.blogspot.com/2015/05/05023 32301-0112048678.html )

bernardoau (August 20, 2012, 03:49PM )

What i need to do, to download this photo for my college search?

Nila Hzataze (March 23, 2011, 02:41PM )

Thanks for post!) Very interesting!)

Brad Templeton (February 08, 2011, 11:41AM )

In light of the debate on how to judge how large a picture truly is, I have a blog post I just wrote proposing stringent rules for how to measure this. ideas.4brad.com/definition-pixels- worlds-biggest-photos 

Leandro Luciano (January 26, 2011, 02:22AM )

Parabéns pela foto e ainda mais tirada da cidade mais bonita do mundo. Tambem sou fã desse gigapan, mas pela impossibilidade de acesso ao equipamento, acabei improvisando um "Gigapan Tabajara" o que me permitiu tirar fotos de até 700mb. ( www.flickr.com/photos/leandrolucia no/3318772693  )

Tran Thi Huong (January 13, 2011, 04:08AM )

The artefacts that you have noticed are software glitches, as the stitching software that we are using is still in beta as indeed is the whole GigaPan project and is still being tested and refined by the scientists involved. You have noticed correctly that there are still some issues in regards to architectural images and shift rendering algorithms to some extent. Fixed aperture and focus were maintained throughout. Thanks for your enquiry. pay per click neon lights

The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (January 03, 2011, 02:23AM )

It's not the biggest any more - www.gigapan.org/gigapans/66626/ is. Much bigger. There is also an interesting debate about how a gigapan "really is". It turns out that this is not an easy question to answer because, in essence, quality is subjective: one person's "crap" is another person's "wow - I'm amazed you even got that to stitch"

MOorthuis (January 03, 2011, 02:08AM )

Well it's the biggest panorama, but it's quality is totally crap. For me the 111 gigapixel of Sevilla is much sharper and nicer because of the nice colours etc. This image is only made to be the biggest but not the most nice one.

Paige Carter (December 24, 2010, 01:06AM )

Beautiful photos. You can use services editing.

Alfred Zhao (December 20, 2010, 01:46PM )

I finally was able to stitch and upload my panorama as mentioned in the early post on this image, you may check it out at www.gigapan.org/gigapans/66626/

David Engle (December 12, 2010, 02:50PM )

As I had mentioned in an earlier GigaPan of yours, www.gigapan.org/gigapans/54825/ I hope to see such phenomenal work done on two GigaPans of Hong Kong, which both would be *awesome* Congrats on this current milestone.

The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (December 12, 2010, 01:44PM )

This image is an amazing achievement - congratulations! I am also amazed that it is not No. 1 at gigapan.org. As to the comments about bigness, my own opinion is that gigapanography is *not* photography. The whole point of gigapans is to engage people in the world of others. Artistic merit is not necessary for this although it helps. What is more important (imo) is the amount of detail in the image - the more detail the more the "Wow" factor and hence the more peple that get involved in learning about other people's worlds. So provided the image is sharp then bigness is everything because that implies more detail.

Vittorio Ghelfi (December 05, 2010, 08:26PM )

I would like to compliment the spectacular shooting, intended to make school for all photographers who come to this magnificent photographic technique that allows us to Gigapan do. Congratulations again! Bravissimo! Ghelfi Vittorio (Italy) Desidero complimentarmi per la spettacolare ripresa fotografica, destinata a fare scuola per tutti i fotografi che si avvicinano a questa magnifica tecnica fotografica che GIGAPAN ci permette di fare. Complimenti ancora! Bravissimo! Vittorio Ghelfi (Italia)

mtoledo (November 01, 2010, 05:26PM )

FOGO!!!!

Lucas M. Garcia Lukierou (November 01, 2010, 03:48PM )

Fantástico, simplesmente, fantástico, sou um amante da fotografia, adorei esta, meus Parabéns a quem tanto trabalho levou a este final feliz. OBRIGADO por este presente.

SAMUEL DAVID SINCLAIR (November 01, 2010, 10:51AM )

Hallo Good Photo, but size is not everything. I think you can make this picture 16 times smaller, without loosing something. I do it also with my Panoramas. I make the new ones 4 or 16 times smaller. You can save time in postprocessing and the upload time is match faster. Also the gigapan server will like you, for this. But sometimes I think, maybe some people don't look at my pictures because the are only 0.5 Gigapixel big. But acutely the were 8 Gigapixel big. I think it would be good when gigapan would measure the information (Contrast between pixels) in the picture and not only the pixels-count. And display the Information-count. If the transition Quality is good or bad, can everybody see, most of the time, easily. But how much Information the Photo really has, is very difficult to see, because the Photos are so big. Also Gigapan could save disk-space and energy. Because people would downsize the Panoramas by them self. What are you thinking, or do they work on this anyway.